ATI Technologies ULC v. Iancu, Nos. 2016-2222, 2016-2406, 2016-2608 (April 11, 2019) (precedential, 3-0); Patent Nos. 6,897,871; 7,327,369 and 7,742,053

Key point:

• Evidence showing diligence in reduction to practice need not be focused only on specific claimed features and can include optional features and alternatives.

Omega Patents, LLC v. CalAmp Corp., No. 2018-1309 (April 8, 2019) (precedential, 3-0); Patent Nos. 6,346,876; 6,756,885; 7,671,727 & 8,032,278

Key points:

• Key prior art should be offered into evidence even if a claim construction appears to render such prior art inapplicable.
• Evidence of advice of counsel is relevant for the specific intent element of induced infringement.