Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. Microsoft Mobile OY, No. 2014-1173, -1178 (November 26, 2014) (nonprecedential) Patent Nos. 7,080,362, 7,225,436, and 6,338,160 

Key point(s): 

• The district court did not abuse its discretion by prohibiting claims under the doctrine of equivalents when only boilerplate language was used in the infringement contentions in contravention of the district court’s Patent Local Rules.