In re WinGen, LLC, No. 2021-2322 (February 2, 2023) (nonprecedential); Patent Application No. 15/229,819 Key point(s): A public display of a plant invention, where the claimed genetics of the plant…

Google LLC v. Hammond Dev. Int’l, Inc., No. 2021-2218 (December 8, 2022) (precedential) (3-0); Patent No. 10,270,816 Key point(s): Collateral estoppel can be applied to reverse IPR decisions regarding claims…

In re Sound View Innovations, LLC, No. 2022-161 (Nov. 22, 2022) (nonprecedential); On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the USPTO in No. 90/015,011 (Patent No. 6,708,213) Key point(s): A…

Eurica Califorrniaa v. Vidal, No. 2022-1640; (November 7, 2022) (nonprecedential); Patent No. 10,245,075 Key point(s): When determining patent term adjustment, applicant’s filing of an after-allowance amendment constitutes a failure to…

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2021-1498; (November 4, 2022) (precedential) (3-0); Patent Nos. 6,628,712; 6,952,450; 7,012,960; 8,407,609; 8,949,954; 9,564,952; 6,349,154; 8,194,632; 6,473,114; 6,253,201; and 6,366,908 Key point(s): An…

Trend Micro Inc. v. CUPP Computing AS, No. 2020-2237, 2020-2238, (October 25, 2022) (nonprecedential) Patent Nos. 8,365,272; 9,756,079 Key point(s): An obviousness analysis requires comparing the prior art to the…

PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WEBER, INC., No. 21-1942 (September 27, 2022) (precedential) (3-0); Patent No. 6,997,089 Key point(s): The Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) requires the PTAB to explicitly address patentability…

Sawstop Holdings LLC. v. Vidal, No. 2021-1537, 2021-2105 (September 14, 2022) (precedential) (3-0); Patent Nos. 9,522,476, 9,927,796 Key point(s): Patent term adjustment under § 154(b)(1)(C) is available only when an…

Arendi S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics., No. 2021-1967 (September 7, 2022) (precedential) (3-0); Patent No(s). 7,917,843 Key point(s): A plaintiff cannot circumvent its own failures to comply with local discovery rules…

Best Medical International, Inc., v. Elekta Inc., No. 2021-2099, 2021-2100 (Issued: August 26, 2022, Modified: August 29, 2022); (precedential) (3-0);Patent No. 6,393,096 Key point(s): The Board has jurisdiction in an…

Click-to-Call Technologies LP v. Ingenio, Inc, No. 2022-1016 (August 17, 2022) (unanimous decision, precedential); Patent No. 5,818,836 Key point(s): 35 U.S.C §315 (e)(2) estoppel prevents an IPR petitioner from litigating…

Samsung Electronics, et. al. v. Dynamics, Inc., No. 2021-2352 (August 2, 2022) (nonprecedential); Patent No. 8,127,153 Key point(s): • For purposes of a record for appeal, the Board’s analysis is…