Pedersen v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 2024-2090 (March 26, 2026) (nonprecedential); Patent No. 6,965,920

Key point(s):

• A Board’s factual finding underlying an obviousness conclusion was supported by substantial evidence where prior art, combined with expert testimony, demonstrates that the claimed delivery parameters—including profile data specifying how messages from specific messengers are delivered—are disclosed.